Course
PHIL-312: Philosophy of Medicine
Document Type
Student Paper
Publication Date
Spring 3-16-2020
Disciplines
Bioethics and Medical Ethics | Disease Modeling | Diseases | Ethics and Political Philosophy | Medical Humanities | Medicine and Health Sciences | Philosophy of Science
Description, Abstract, or Artist's Statement
“Disease mongering” is the practice of widening diagnostic boundaries of an illness and promoting their public awareness to expand the markets for treatment and to increase profits. This tactic typically used by pharmaceutical companies, medical equipment manufacturers, insurance companies, and even some doctors and patient groups, has become a great concern. Disease mongering has since increased in parallel with “medicalization,” which attempts to label normal human conditions as medical problems, thus becoming the subject of medical study, diagnosis, prevention, or treatment. This paper first seeks to examine how an increasing amount of life’s natural conditions and ailments are being seen as medical conditions. I will then argue that this alone does not result in disease mongering, rather third parties’ attempt to make these conditions seem more serious and widespread than they actual are contributes to the problem. Furthermore, the treatments for these problems are oversold despite sometimes being ineffective or causing more problems on top of the ones they claim to treat. De-medicalization based on respect for human dignity, rather than investor value, is long overdue. The unethical practice of disease mongering can only be combated with joint initiatives from patients, providers, and the general public.
Augustana Digital Commons Citation
Iroegbulem, Vanessa C.. "Disease Mongering: How Sickness Sells" (2020). Augustana Center for the Study of Ethics Essay Contest.
https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/ethicscontest/20
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Included in
Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Disease Modeling Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Medical Humanities Commons, Philosophy of Science Commons
Comments
3rd Place Winner, 2020